I
Am Piano posits the piano as strange chimerical beast - capable
of expressive language and conducive to displaying masterly control,
yet equally capable of generating an abject 'piano-ness' which states
nothing more than "I am piano".
For
some, the piano is universal, natural, organic, essential. For others,
it is problematised by its history - particularly its 'frozen history'
which implies that there is such a thing as its inalienable 'acoustic'
sound. I Am Piano hears the piano in this latter way
- as a noise machine which appears to speak language but which ultimately
generates complex sono-musical encodings of time, place, action and
activity whose surface is read as music. John Cage discerned the overtones
of the piano and 'excavated' them via his prepared-piano processing.
I Am Piano discerns those same tones in the phonological
documents of piano recordings, and accordingly works with their materiality
in the name of composition.
"There
may have once been a time when musical instruments sounded like they
came from somewhere. They would have peculiarly reverberated in space,
accruing their sonic identity from the way their mechanics forced sound
throughout and within that space. You could have sat there and said:
yes, that piano over there does sound like a piano indeed.
But
who listens to pianos these days? In fact, who has really heard one?
And more importantly: what is there to be gained by identifying a piano
anyway? Inasmuch as sound can never be separated from space - from that
specific phenomenological acousmonium which provides the frame and realm
within which we identify sounds and soundings - all recordings of sound
ultimately document the space of those occurrences. Put simply, whenever
you hear a recording of an instrument - a lingering piano chord in a
hall, a snare rim shot close-miced, a muted trumpet diffused from a
stage, a fender guitar through a Marshall stack - the recording is defined
by the characteristics of the space in which the instrument was performed,
and the means by which the instrument was recorded. The materiality
of this phonology is obvious enough in any age of mechanical reproduction,
but what is of deeper interest is how sampling culture has affected
ways of hearing space while identifying sounds."
(From
Sonic
Occupancy)