Audio visual presentations of Philip Brophy's commissioned film scores & sound designs - 2000 >>>
 
        
          b a c k g r o u n d     O V E R V I E W    t e c h n i c a l    r e s o u r c e s    F A Q s

While the term 'sound design' is still struggling for acceptance in a global film industry that is attuned to the sonic as much as a slug is attuned to contemporary art, there is a growing rationalization of sound design that is not helping its more creative aspects to flourish. 'Sound design' is struggling for respect as a craft - as a begging discourse which seeks compensation for being belittled by the deaf brethren engaged in everything but sound post-production. While sound designers are rarely if at all acknowledged for their contribution to the cinematic event of audiovision we call 'movies', the recourse - particularly voiced by American/English-speaking film culture - is to make heroes out of sound designers while conservatively affirming that they are under contract to greater forces to service the industry dilligently and intelligently.

But this modern consicousness of sound design has done little to change the deafness in cinema. Nor has it forced American/English-speaking film practitioners out of their narrow frame of reference. Worse, most sound designers voice altruisms about narrative, drama and myth which speciously sound like the retarded rhetoric employed by script doctors worldwide.

Sound design need not be hemmed in by these conservative channels of expression. Sound design can actively contribute to the creative shaping of a film as both a modernist and post-modernist amalgam of mediarized voices and effects. It can foreground psychological, psycho-acoustic, phonological, acousmatic and sono-iconic aspects of the cinematic experience. And it can do so in subtle 'naturalist' ways as effectively as it can unleash wild and bombastic cacophonies of sono-musical collapse.


These ideas - similar to what Philip Brophy has voiced in numerous published articles - form the crux of the various experimental applications he has been fortunate enough to develop with willing directors on the range of projects for which he has been engaged. The De-sign presentations show how these seemingly 'radical' or 'problematic' notions can very easily and positively be incorporated into industrial practice without destroying the original integrity of a film and the director's sensibility.


Complete contents of this page © Philip Brophy